Day six was rather productive for me. I hope it was for you too.
Today, I have done:
- Writing
- Editing
- Sent fic to beta
- Post
- Planning and/or research
- Procrastinate
- Something else I will describe in comments.
Today's question: How AU does a fic have to be before it's crossing into original fiction? Is it strictly an issue of characterisation, or are there other things at play?
Today, I have done:
- Writing
- Editing
- Sent fic to beta
- Post
- Planning and/or research
- Procrastinate
- Something else I will describe in comments.
Today's question: How AU does a fic have to be before it's crossing into original fiction? Is it strictly an issue of characterisation, or are there other things at play?
Tags:
no subject
Date: Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 17:09 (UTC)(It's weird answering my own question but) I don't know if it's just characterisation. Maybe that's all it is. I know I had a dystopic Western AU that was fanfic that decided, halfway through, that my characters were actually original characters, and it wasn't going to be fanfic anymore. I'm sure anyone who knows the original idea and the original fandom may pick up who's who, but I doubt anyone else would.
I suppose we're also opening up the 'thinly veiled fanfic' territory too. I'm guilty of doing that a few times. I'm still not entirely sure if they're fanfic or original either. I can't always tell if I wrote them to be fanfic, or wrote them to be original fic. So IDK.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 18:57 (UTC)I haven't worked on anything of my own today yet. Hopefully tonight when I get home I'll have some time to myself to write or edit.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 20:15 (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 20:46 (UTC)If I'm writing an AU, I like if possible to bring in references to canon events, so that readers can connect them. Therefore my AUs generally aren't quite classifiable as original fiction - because without knowing the references the reader loses out.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 21:49 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, July 7th, 2011 01:14 (UTC)I'm going to try to keep my mind on the main track for the rest of the evening and ignore those things that try to sidetrack me, and hopefully I'll be able to report a word count tomorrow!
This question of AU is very interesting. In some ways, the minute you turn to AU, you are beginning to delve into original fiction -- in the sense that you are having characters do things, go places, meet people that you thought up yourself. You might be playing with canon characters or settings, but very often you are also creating something that is essentially new. It's not really original in that you are borrowing characters and settings, but there are other elements that make it original. I write a lot of this kind of AU. I've never actually attempted anything totally original!
no subject
Date: Thursday, July 7th, 2011 06:38 (UTC)For the AU question, going to agree with pensnest, there. I have done a couple AUs and I would reference some canon stuff here and there. And of course, characterization is a must. I have to recognize the characters from canon and if they don't act themselves then I would think the story is original.
no subject
Date: Thursday, July 7th, 2011 14:11 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, July 7th, 2011 16:33 (UTC)The most AUish thing I've ever written was a Halloween story where wee!Michael Myers is non-neurotypical rather than Pure Unadulterated Evil, but I thought of it more like Taking Issues With Canon rather than an AU. He still (rot13) xvyyf Whqvgu. Which isn't much of an answer.