![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Tell us about your writing endeavors for the day. Have you...
~ written
~ edited
~ researched
~ beta'd someone else's work
~ taken the day off to refresh the muse
Discussion question...PET PEEVES...what are some of your fic reading peeves??
Let's have a bit of lesson, shall we? I'm feeling a bit ranty today, so don't take offense at my tone, K??
Just a few things that have come across my radar recently...
A) "If you think that {insert whatever here}, then you've got another THINK coming." It's THINK people, not THING. Get it > > if you think something, but it's incorrect then you must THINK again. Hence you've got another THINK coming.
B) Over use of canon fodder. And to explain that I'm going to give you an example...in Harry Potter, the character of Draco Malfoy was sorted into Slytherin House at Hogwarts. The house colors are green and silver. Of late, practically every fic I've read has Draco's personal home bedroom decorated in--you guessed it--silver and green. You know, maybe Draco's favorite color is actually blue or orange or purple.
C) Summery vs. Summary > > the first means to have something to with summer, the second is that short write up of what a fic is about
and last, but not least
D) All or most of the words in a fic's title should be capitalized. The only words not capped (unless it is the first word, of course) are: the, a, an, of, for, by, to, on, as, and, & are.
So what are your PEEVES?
~ written
~ edited
~ researched
~ beta'd someone else's work
~ taken the day off to refresh the muse
Discussion question...PET PEEVES...what are some of your fic reading peeves??
Let's have a bit of lesson, shall we? I'm feeling a bit ranty today, so don't take offense at my tone, K??
Just a few things that have come across my radar recently...
A) "If you think that {insert whatever here}, then you've got another THINK coming." It's THINK people, not THING. Get it > > if you think something, but it's incorrect then you must THINK again. Hence you've got another THINK coming.
B) Over use of canon fodder. And to explain that I'm going to give you an example...in Harry Potter, the character of Draco Malfoy was sorted into Slytherin House at Hogwarts. The house colors are green and silver. Of late, practically every fic I've read has Draco's personal home bedroom decorated in--you guessed it--silver and green. You know, maybe Draco's favorite color is actually blue or orange or purple.
C) Summery vs. Summary > > the first means to have something to with summer, the second is that short write up of what a fic is about
and last, but not least
D) All or most of the words in a fic's title should be capitalized. The only words not capped (unless it is the first word, of course) are: the, a, an, of, for, by, to, on, as, and, & are.
So what are your PEEVES?
Tags:
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 18:28 (UTC)Another couple peeves I have are misuse of apostrophes and capitalization of random words.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 18:37 (UTC)1) Sceptical vs. Skeptical. I know that the former is the legitimate everywhere-but-the-US spelling, but every time I read it I think of septic tanks. Because it's a legit spelling, though, I don't feel right complaining about it.
2) You can't spell "masturbate" without "U"! I have seriously clicked the back button more than once because people spelled it with an E instead.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 19:48 (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 21:37 (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 21:47 (UTC)It does, doesn't it?!
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 8th, 2011 01:33 (UTC)They are then awarded a certificate and the title Master Debater. While I have only ever been to the one, I would not be at all surprised if that same joke is repeated each time.
(Alternately, one of my younger brother's friends is a young man of the Bates family. Oh Master Bate(s), your tea is ready!)
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 8th, 2011 07:00 (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 19:11 (UTC)E.g., If my mother and I are arguing about abortion over the phone and I say, "If you think that, you've got another thing coming" I don't mean she's going to get a new thought. Because she's not, her opinion's never changed. I'm threatening to hang up the phone and stop speaking to her. I'm giving her a new thing to deal with.
But incidentally, "I could care less" bugs the FUCK out of me. And people have tried to argue it as "It's so insignificant I could care less than I already do" but that's not how caring works! At all.
It's here to stay like many phrase changes. I accept that legitimacy as languages and phrases are always changing as they move from different regions and different generations. But that one just irks me, and it's probably the only one that does. Or at least, the only one that I consistently remember because I hear it everywhere.
I tend to only use two word titles, as that is my fandom's tradition, but I do have this and some other stuff bookmarked about titles.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 22:25 (UTC)Or the other trend appears to be to make titles complete, entire sentences with only the first word capitalized. Odd?
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 22:44 (UTC)there is only one e.e. cummings.
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 8th, 2011 01:42 (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 22:47 (UTC)But language and the rules of language evolve so I think this is a losing battle for me. :)
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 8th, 2011 01:40 (UTC)That's why I surrender 'I could care less' to common usage though it bugs the hell out of me. At least 'You've got another thing coming' can make sense to me. Trying to say you don't care by saying you... care... Just never will.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 19:58 (UTC)Nope.
Think is the verb.
Thought is the noun.
To hold by the flawed logic then it should be: If you think that, then you've got another thought coming.
Personally, I hold with the logic of the poster above. What might be coming might not be another idea/thought, it might be a flying fist. Also, a new thought or idea is a new thing, so ....
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 22:43 (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 20:33 (UTC)http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/thing.html
I guess this is one of those things that can go either way.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 20:41 (UTC)A dictionary:
http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/You%27ve+got+another+think+coming
The Boston Globe says so too:
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/05/04/the_think_thing/
Some random sites:
http://alt-usage-english.org/excerpts/fxyouhav.html
http://forum.wordreference.com/showthread.php?t=87385
And Wikitionary:
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/have_another_think_coming
And a grammarist:
http://www.grammarist.com/usage/another-think-coming/
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 21:34 (UTC)- One is that (particularly in that phrase) it's easy to hear "think" as "thing", because of the way people talk. Someone at the WordReference source breaks down why that is.
- The other is that I'm a native English speaker from the American Southeast, and I never hear "think" used as a noun -- I'm assuming other people fall in this category, too. Because "think" is always a verb in my head, like
Put it together and since people tend to hear what they want to hear, substituting "thing" is super-easy, and it gets used like that again and again. Also, I follow previous posters' logic in their semantic breakdown of the phrase, so "thing" just makes more sense to me.
Either way, I've learned something. Thanks for bringing this up! *tosses linguist hat into the wind*
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 22:40 (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 21:22 (UTC)Concerning pet peeves:
In August I wrote a mini rant about a recent one of mine, the phrase "like a teenage girl" being used to describe behaviours or emotions of grown men which I've been encountering all summer in different slash fiction.
I'm still not sure if I'm overreacting, I'd appreciate any thoughts you might want to share about this.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 22:29 (UTC)I don't know about over-reacting. You see something once and it irks you, but you don't worry about it, but when you see something over and over and over and over, well, it does get pretty irritating to where you want to hit something. :)
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 8th, 2011 07:04 (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 21:42 (UTC)As for peeves: To be completely honest, my spelling is atrocious so I tend to be more forgiving on those kinds of errors. :P
A lot of my fandoms come from Japanese source material, I could probably write an essay on my distaste for "fangirl" Japanese showing up in fics. It's usually really jarring or awkward, and a fair amount of time the writer isn't using the given term correctly. I get that some words are hard to translate, and I use the occasional word for flavor or emphasis every now and then, but I'm generally of the school of "I'm writing in English, so I'll use English so it flows better". I wonder if this happens in other fandoms with other non-English source material?
Something else that tends to happen in my fandoms is exaggerating certain characters' characteristics, even fic that's not meant to be humorous. I get the "alternative character interpretation" thing, but just because character 'A' is far from a genius, seeing everyone write him as "too dumb to live" annoys the heck out of me.
Re: exaggeration
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 21:47 (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 22:30 (UTC)I agree. Average intelligence is average, not stupid. :)
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 21:49 (UTC)It's must HAVE, people. Via the contraction 'must've'.
Honestly.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 22:15 (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 22:31 (UTC)That drives me bonkers too!
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 23:19 (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 22:04 (UTC)I like your pet peeves. Good points. I am egregiously bad at getting my homophones mixed up.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 22:05 (UTC)... in other news, I wrote 938 words today and have thus finished my first fanfic in months. \o/ It still needs a lot of editing, but still! Actual fic! :D
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 22:33 (UTC)On the defiantly vs. definitely--that's just a bad beta reader or no beta reader etc...
barely vs. barley
quite vs. quiet
There's all kinds of those.
You really just have to know your own weakness and make sure you have a beta reader with a really good eye for those. :)
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 8th, 2011 09:51 (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 22:07 (UTC)My biggest pet peeve, especially on lj/dw, is incomplete headers. Specifically not having the word count. I know it's not essential but I want a general idea of how long something will take me to read, ie should I start it now before bed or work or leave it for later? and sometimes I'm not in the mood for long fic, or other times I just want to curl up and lose myself in long fic.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 22:35 (UTC)And I agree with fic headers. Also stupid summarys... "This is my first fic." is not a summary and I *defiantly* won't be reading it.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 22:38 (UTC)I've come across that one several times this past week.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 23:06 (UTC)Pet peeves? Let's see. Not just in fic but the world at large - the insertion of an apostrophe every time the guilty party sees an "s." There's a shop down the street advertising "ice cream cone's." No. Just NO. Plus the other rampant mistakes: "your" for "you're," "their" for "they're," and so on.
And yes, I agree with you: overuse of "canon fodder." Our seeing a little bit of something ONE TIME doesn't mean it's always true. A character ordering a salad one time doesn't mean he eats nothing but salads.
But I think my all-time peeve with fic is authors who do this:
"It's not true." Sam said.
If I click into a story and see that particular mistake 3 or 4 times in the first few paragraphs, I won't read any further. Guaranteed. It could be the best story on the planet, and I won't know that, because I can't get past the wall that that particular mistake throws up.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, September 7th, 2011 23:16 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, September 8th, 2011 09:48 (UTC)Heh, I've got a "leather bag's" shop in the neighbourhood, too. I never know whether to laugh or facepalm when I walk past.
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 8th, 2011 00:46 (UTC)I actually don't have too many pet peeves, although canon fodder is one of them. ficwriter1966's rant of using a period instead of a comma like that in dialogue is another pet peeve of mine. While we're on that subject, every time I see "I love you," He said that irks me too.
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 8th, 2011 02:31 (UTC)Two things that truly bug me are:
1) when someone announces in their summary that their summary sucks, but they expect me to move right on in and still be interested in reading their story. As soon as I see "this summary sucks" or "I suck at summaries" I'm moving on to something else, thank you.
2) people referring to canon as cannon.
3) characters being referred to by their hair color in place of their name. This is interesting once in awhile for variety, but to have whole paragraphs (even whole stories) where all the characters are spoken of only by their hair color and we hardly ever see their name seems very odd to me. It's currently not something that causes me to stop reading, but it takes me out of the story big time.
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 8th, 2011 02:34 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, September 8th, 2011 07:10 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, September 8th, 2011 10:51 (UTC)The thing of that one is, very rarely do people think of themselves (1st person POV) or people they know well or love by hair color (3rd person POV).
I don't go around thinking of my husband as the guy with the salt & pepper hair. So why would Harry constantly refer to Ginny as the red-haired girl? He wouldn't. It's one thing to spot a flash of red in the crowd, hoping it's that person, but to belabor the point is tiring.
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 8th, 2011 09:43 (UTC)As for pet peeves, random pov changes will throw me out of a story. I can overlook spelling mistakes or strange comma usage, but pov changes put the whole head cinema to a stop and leave me very confused as to what is going on.
no subject
Date: Thursday, September 8th, 2011 10:53 (UTC)I don't recommend it, but sometimes it can be pulled off well enough that I'll push through a fic, but if it's really awful, I'm gone.